رقابة مجلس النواب على اعمال الحكومة "دراسة في الاستجواب البرلماني "

Abstract

Any discussion of a parliamentary system does not work in any form, without talking lengthily about one of the characteristics of parliamentary that differs it from presidential and Council systems, and that is the right of parliamentary political control on the functions of the government collectively or on the ministers individually, all of which comes within the base of mutual influence between the legislature and executive authorities, in order to achieve the balance between them.The interrogation of ministers and the withdrawal of confidence from them is one of the important constitutional tools by which the Representatives can practice the control over the executive authority, where lawmakers can question ministers about the legal and administrative Violations, which were located during the course of their duties.The interrogation aims on finding out the truth of a subject related to the executive duties,so the government's embrace of transparency in its dealings and clarity in their actions, especially on the urgent security issues or aspects of governmental spending or large investment deals, leads to the facilitation of Representatives’ control over governmental functions, without Resorting to the path of questioning.On the other hand a mutual trust between the legislative and executive authorities, and strong relationship between them, are considered as an indication of the need for interrogation or not, the more confidence, the less use of interrogation, and we think that the brunt of the strengthening of this trust rests on the government through the implementation of its obligations and promises and respecting the laws and abide by them.