The Concept of Purpose and Its Effect on the Disagreement of the Jurists in the Section of Purification

Abstract

The concept of purpose is one of the fundamental subjects that jurists differ in its judgment. Jurists have devised a lot of doctrinal issues based on this fundamental basis in the section of acts of devotion, transactions, personal status and felonies. The researcher chooses this subject because of the diversity in its judgment and the judgment of the doctrinal issues based on it. Moreover, because of the capacity as well as the complexity of the subject, he deals with the effect of this concept on the diversity of jurists in the section of purification only. That is because of the importance of this issue as it is a condition for the prayer which is the basis of our religion.العدد الرابع والسبعون مجلة ديالى / 710233The research is divided into: an introduction, two sections and a conclusion. The first sectiondeals with defining the concept of purpose and its authenticity.The second one deals with the doctrinal issues in the section of purification which based on this concept. As for the conclusion, the followings are the concluded remarks:1. The concept of purpose is one of the fundamental subjects on which jurists disagreed whether to consider it as an argument or not.2. The purpose means the meaning of the text which is confined toa purpose for forfeiting the judgment after this purpose and proving the opposite.3. Scientists of linguistics and assets mention that the two words (hata- ela) belongto the concept of purpose. These words mean that what follows is an ultimate judgment of what came before.4. After viewing the evidences of the scientists of both the confirming and forfeiting groups concerning the concept of purpose, it turns out that the most correct opinion is that of the confirming group.