@Article{, title={Penalty for work for public benefit in the Jordanian Youth Law No. 32 of 2014 عقوبة العمل للمنفعة العامة في قانون الاحداث الاردني رقم 32 لسنة 2014}, author={زيد خلف فرج عبدالله الظفيري}, journal={AL-ANBAR University Journal of Law and Political Sciences مجلة جامعة الانبار للعلوم القانونية والسياسية}, volume={7}, number={1}, pages={261-284}, year={2017}, abstract={The Penalty of the work for the public benefit is considered as one of the modern alternative sanctions that were beginning to resort to by the most of the countries in the criminal policy, In order to reform convicts and rehabilitation of juvenile convicts and re-integrate them into society. And also reduce the expenditures on prisons and ease the financial burden for the state. Consequently, this study dealt with the Penalty of the work for the public benefit in the Jordanian Juveniles Act No. 32 of 2014. And the importance of this alternative punishment as applied to events, and) تزل جامع ا ٢ىبار للعل وْ القاى ىْ اّلس أس العدد الثإى عشر المجلد ا ٢ لّ السي ) 20172 65impediments to their application and the terms and conditions of its implementation. And its potential to achieve the goals and objectives that expected of in repairing the culprit and rehabilitation for the purpose of him. This is achieved through three demands, where the introductory one addressed what is the penalty of the work for the public benefit and its historical development, and this was to clarify what this qualifying mode of punishment is, it also dealt with terms of Penalty of the work for the public benefit and its application in cases of criminal legislation. In the second requirement the study addressed the characteristics and purposes of the Penalty of work for the public benefit and means of its success. At the end of the research we came to some conclusions the most important one was the absence of a clear mechanism in the Jordanian legislation to the concept of this alternative punishment and implementation mechanism. And that happened as a result of not determining the business assigned to the Juvenile offender, not determining those who can perform the work in its favor, not determining the hours of work that can convict judged by

تعتةةةةو عق بْةةةة العنةةةةا للني عةةةة العامةةةة مةةةة العق بْةةةةةاد البد لٓةةةةة اتذد ثٓةةةةة الةةةةة بةةةةةد د تل ةةةةةال ةَٔةةةا الةةةةفي الةةةةد لّ س أسةةةةت اَ اتدياٜ ةٔةةة ٤جةةةةاإصةةةةة ٣ه تّ ةٍٔةةةةا ا مةةةةة وْ علةةةةة هَٔ مةةةةة المةةةةةداىا ٤لأةةةةةدا إّعةةةةةاد دتز ةَةةةةه المجتنةةةةة إ ةةةةةا الى التقل ةٔةةةةةةةا مةةةةةةةة الي قةةةةةةةةاد علةةةةةةةةٙ السةةةةةةةة تّخ ةٔةةةة عباٜ ةَةةةةا ا لمال ةٔةةةة عةةةةة الد لّةةةةة عّل ةٔةةةة تيا لّيةةةا ةٍةةر الدراسةةة عق بْةةة العنةةةا للني عةةة العامةةة الةةة اْرد قةةةاى ا ٤لأةةةدا ا ٤ردىةةة رقةةةةه32 لسةةةةةي 2014 نٍ ةٔةةةة ةٍةةةةر العق بْةةةةة البد لٓةةةةة مةةةةة لأ ةٔةةةة ت ب قٔ ةَةةةةا علةةةةةٙ ا ٤لأةةةةةدا مّع قْةةةةةادت ب قٔ ةَةةا طّةةةر تّ لّأةةةا ٢د تي ةٔةةر اٍ إّمماى تٔ ةَةةاتحق ةٔةةةد ا ٤ ةٍةةةدا اّل ا ةٓةةةةاد المرجةةةة مي ةَةةةةاإصةةة ٣ه اتذةةةد إّعةةةاد ت لٍٔةةة ل ةةةر دتزةةة اليسةةةةةةةةةة ا ٢جتنةةةةةةةةةةإع تّحق ةٔةةةةةةةةةد م ةةةةةةةةةةل ت ال ضلٙ.قّةةةةةد اةةةةة ةٍةةةةرا الم ةةةةة مةةةةة اةةةةة ٣ل ٣ ةةةةة م الةةةةةةةفي تيا لّيةةةةةةةا الم لةةةةةةةفي التن ةَٔةةةةةةد ميةةةةةةة ;ُما ةٍٔةة عق بْةةة العنةةةا للني عةةة العامةةة تّ رْ ةٍةةاالتةةةةةةةة رح ةةةةةةةة يا ما ةٍٔةةةةةةة ةٍةةةةةةةرا الةةةةةةةةينالتةةةةةةة لٍٔ مةةةةةةة العق بْةةةةةةة تّ صةةةةةةة لٔ اَ القةةةةةةةاى ىْ تّيا لّيةةةةةةا الم لةةةةةةفي ا ٤ لّ مةةةةةة ةٍةةةةةر الدراسةةةةةة ;٘طةةةر تّ عق بْةةة العنةةةا للني عةةة العامةةة لّأةةةا ٢دت ب قٔ ةَةةةةا التشةةةةةر عٓاد اتدااٜ ةٔةةةة الم لةةةةةفيالثةةةةةةةإى ; ا ةةةةةةةاٜص اةةةةةةةرا عق بْةةةةةةة العنةةةةةةةاللني ع العام سّّاٜا تصالأ اَ.} }