@Article{, title={Structuralism and the Problem of Text البنيوية ومحنة النص}, author={Hayder Fadhil Abbas حيذر فاضل عباس}, journal={Journal of the College of Education for Women مجلة كلية التربية للبنات}, volume={29}, number={4}, pages={2804-2811}, year={2018}, abstract={All modern critical approaches attempt to cover the meanings and overtones of the text,claiming that they are better than others in the analysis and attainment of the intendedmeanings of the text. The structural approach claims to be able to do so more than any othermodern critical approach, as it claimed that it is possible to separate what is read from thereader, on the presumed belief that it is possible to read the text with a zero-memory.However, the studies in criticism of criticism state that each of these approaches is successfulin dealing with the text in one or more aspects while failing in one or more aspects.Consequently, the criticism whether the approach possesses the text, or that the text rejectsthis possession, remains in search for its completion in different approaches. Therefore, therivalry between modern critical approaches remained in order to avoid incomplete coverageof the text. But, can the complete coverage of the text be achieved? This question remains, in its essence, a philosophical one. Therefore, can we find anobjective answer for it?

} }