@Article{, title={Yield and economic analysis of maize production using various combined tillage machines and comparison to the conventional tillage systems}, author={Aqeel J. Nassir and Dakhil R. Ndawi and Sadiq J. Muhsin}, journal={Thi-Qar University Journal for Agricultural Researches مجلة جامعة ذي قار للبحوث الزراعية}, volume={11}, number={2}, pages={269-284}, year={2022}, abstract={This research study was carried out at the agriculture college research station, University of Basrah, in the 2021 season. The main objective of this research was to investigate the effect of comparing five combinations of combined tillage machines on maize yield in order to evaluate crop yield, and fuel consumption and compare them to five conventional tillage systems. The combined tillage machines are The T1 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm, a chisel plow, a disk harrow, and a roller. T2 is similar to T1, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm. A T3 combined tillage machine consists of a subsoiler operating at a depth of 60 cm and a chisel plow. T4 is similar to T3, except the subsoiler operates at a depth of 40 cm. A T5 combined tillage machine consists of a chisel plow and a disk harrow. The conventional tillage systems include M1, which consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller), M2 consists of four passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow + disk harrow + roller ), M3 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 60 cm + chisel plow ), M4 consists of two passes (subsoiler at a depth of 40 cm + chisel plow ), M5 consists of two passes (chisel plow + disk harrow ). Each treatment was replicated three times, and the data was analyzed using a randomized complete block design in this experiment. The mean of the treatments for the combined tillage machines and conventional tillage systems were compared using the t-test at the probability level (0.01). The results of the combined tillage machines T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 comparison with conventional tillage systems M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 revealed that the maize yield increased by 56.10 and 59.42, 56.48, 35.29, and 35.31% and saved fuel by 54.86 and 60.42, 36.77, 39.77, and 42.20% and decreased the total cost by 24.62, 24.70, 28.70, 27.61, and 16.50%. However, BCR was raised by 96.62, 101.28, 92.44, 68.35.20, and 57.24%, respectively. Soil tillage by combined tillage machines was found to have positive effects on yield and fuel consumption of the maize yield.

} }