Instantiate Lexical Innovation of Psychological Ideation

Abstract

L-users, virtually, are keen on the psycholinguistic tasks to be performed while interacting. Sometimes one might be baffled with the influx of neologisms due to their inconsistency or multiplefaced constructions. To debaffle such rather enigmatic forms, a linguistic explanation and analysis of their production are conducted hoping to show how they work. Being linguistically fluctuated, we opt for general viewing for neos endorsement by lexicographers who are more adept at manipulating them. Either accepted or not, one should surf their influx and probe their four phases to be finally established. Factors involved in the interpretability of the psycholinguistic aspects of neos are reviewed. Other factors account for their production, especially when a speaker cannot remember a particular word coined alternatives leading to constraints on the processing of producing new forms. Some in-a-go new entities enter the sensory temporary storage of L-users where some are preserved for a notable brief period to let the brain process them; or to be discarded in a part of a second. If rehearsed or recognized, these new inputs are transferred into the short-term storage; the working memory. The axiomatic quest of how such errors have been addressed was processed, and whether a single exposure already leaves a trace in lexical memory. It rests upon the idea that a neo is a word/phrase that fills a gap or expresses an idea in fairly different ways which mainly come up due to need, necessity, contact or a tongue slip.