The nature of the penal responsibility of the editor in chief

Abstract

The Origin of the penal responsibility is not based only on personal fault, with consideration of the personality principle that ensures all the constitutions and laws are recognized. Each person holds responsibility for their own action. which is referred in this topic which values the legislature or the judiciary of this responsibility based on the occurrence of the act or an omission for the criminal act in the abstract. As a result of this act, the perpetrator is considered responsible of this act, other people are also held responsible for the act even with an indirect mistake. and this refers to the extent of correlation, which must happen between emerging penal responsibility and personal fault of the official and the case with most often in the area of responsibility for the actions of another, and the criminal law holds no place for such incident in the case of assuming responsibility. For this reason, questions arise about the basis of the responsibility of the editor on chief, whether the criminal acts are committed by his followers. Are there any responsibilities that relate to the personal fault or is an exceptional case approved by the legislature and considered a departure from the general rules in criminal lawJudging by the importance of the subject and the difference in opinions of the judiciary and jurisprudence, we have decided to study this issue through two chapters: the first being the identification of the various penal responsibilities of the chief editor. And the position of the judiciary from this responsibility being the second chapter.