" دور الهيكل المؤسسي في الادارة الحضرية لمدن ما بعد الحرب "

Abstract

The research highlighted the effect of the strength of governmental institutions in building the resilience of post- wars cities. The research presented a set of challenges and opportunities in the framework of building the Resilience, the research has two main parts, theoretical and practical, and the last targeted the city of Ramadi which faced a sever military operations since 2003. The search results That the institutional structure in Iraq is old and viable. the idea of destroying existing foundations was not supported. It also emerged that the Iraqi institution is not the result of the recent past, but rather one of the oldest institutions in the region, the weakness of the departments and the leadership capabilities hindered this extension. It also appears that there is a relatively acceptable reception of the idea of potential competencies capable of promoting the country – although they have not got official positions- but were immersed for several reasons. There is considerable support for the idea of transitional institutions as they may support two conceptions: first, not to destroy existing institutions and second to provide a dedicated source of implementation and ongoing expertise despite fears of stealing government expertise and disrupting the strategy of exit and sustainability. The Anbar experience, including Rumadi city, showed that the model adopted - explained in the theoretical section - under the Transitional Administration - is the model of the regular country systems formed by the local Anbar government itself, which often operated outside the province during the occupation of the province with a spectrum of model National institutional arrangements using local institutions represented by crisis cells, reconciliation committees and international and local NGOs.