مآخذ السَّمّين الحلبي النحوية على الكوفيين في كتابه: الدر المصون في علوم الكتاب المكنون

Abstract

AbstractThe syntactic argument appeared very small since the beginning of the Arabic grammar, whenever the grammar grows more, the matters of argument became more wide among the grammarians. The beginning of this argument appeared clearly between Abdullah bin Abi Ishaq Al-Hadrami and his student Esa bin Amro bin Abi Al-Al’a, and not only among the Basrah people themselves, but also among the Basrah and Kufi peoples, and this is due to the inconsistency of hearing, comparison, justification, interpretation and assumption. We have seen that more clearly between Abdullah bin Abi Ishaq Al-Hadrami and his student Esa bin Amro bin Abi Al-Al’a, and then it became more clearly between Younis and Al-Khalil and their followers. That who contemplate the book of Al-Sameen Al-Halbi, he finds with his responses to Kufis and his tendency to the Basrah ideology, but he was not bigoted to his opinions but he was with a clear personality and a wise opinion, and we see that through his presentation for the Kufis performance in more than one case and his approval to them, and let us contemplate his speech during his interpretation for the word (يُدْخِلْهُ)( ) where he says: ((while the kufis particularize and they say: if the adjective puts into the genitive: and the pronoun became unclear, it is necessary to present the pronoun as it for the Basrah ideology, for example: (زيدٌ عمروٌ ضاربهُ هو) this is if the beating was made by Zaid on Omer, and if it was not unclear, it is not necessary to present the pronoun, for example: (زيدٌ هنـدٌ ضاربها), and if this is to be decided, then Al-Zojaj ideology in this verse goes with the Kufis opinon and it is a fair ideology))( ), where he does not only mentioned the Kufi ideology but he declared his acceptance to it.