The jurisprudential provisions concerning erectile organs in the relationship between spouses

Abstract

The study of this topic reached the following conclusions:1 which shows me and God knows best to use these devices: For the following:First: All evidence that indicates the legitimacy of medication.Second: looking at the purposes of the Shari'a, it is the purposes of the bone (preservation of offspring and supply and the survival of the family) and the use of these devices achieve this great destination. A person who is impotent does not have a child by using what he can pass on to a woman's vagina. This is because the pregnancy is often only by the penetration of the woman's vagina and ejaculation. It also gives it the right to enjoy the downturn. Which is one of the most important rights, if the security of harm to the person, and the interest was likely this process in the lowest degrees of permissibility.Third: Fundamental rules say: ((Messages take the rule of purposes)) and do not do the duty is a duty. If the husband's destination is to mourn himself and his wife and get the offspring. And the survival of the family entity is high, there is no doubt that this destination is required and the means that are required.2 There are controls for the installation of these devices and if we adhere to these controls become installed permissible.3 It is not permissible to take him out of the dead because he leads to the destruction of the sanctity of the deceased and because he is also the body of the dead.4 If a man is tired of his wife, the illness will disappear because the curse has passed.It is not necessary to use these devices.5 6 This device gets the analysis of the wife of her first husband