Concept symbol between art and architecture

Abstract

The study included the first of four chapters devoted to review the research problem and its significance, its goals and limits as well as the definition of the terms. The second chapter Ahtoyaly Tar theoretical split into two sections firstly talked about the concept of the icon in the art the second section dealt with the concept of the icon in the architecture. The third chapter deals with procedures Researcher search to move to the analysis of samples which included four works, two of which Fine Khran Mmarian selected Qsidia and analyzed according to the method of observation and description. The fourth chapter contains the findings, conclusions and was one of the most important resultsThe ambiguity of the idea of ​​the icon depends on what summarizes the Elms secrets, and damn to divest its shape and distance from the direct representation of natural XiaeTechnical features Symbol higher than the architect as a pattern with unique meanings and novel and untested in normal life, but it's linked to aesthetic experiences, which selects from the partial meanings transforms Any representation includes the same experience as part of the original components.Symbol attributes technical ability to generate intellectual relations sham symbolic systems instead of the iconic images in order to deepen and open horizons connotations interpretations of what is owned symbol of arbitrary relationships surrounding Doualeh and its implications. With limited indications architectural icon on direct assignment without breeding meaningsTechnical Code associated with many images encoded Bmarjaaat historical Aoldtha, and when evocation must read those references and linked to the system of communityAartbat concept of symbolic value reading achieved as a result of the detection and interpretation and using functions Avatar